Instead he finds himself flitting from one article to the next, clicking on links, skimming the page for highlighted or bolded words that are designed for the readers of today whose attention spans are rapidly receding.
Through the use of multiple strategies, Carr explains his idea that our own intelligence is actually becoming artificial intelligence. He urges everyone to reevaluate their ability to learn from and concentrate on a long piece of work.
Carr focuses on his audience throughout this article in order to convince them of his thoughts and findings. He relies heavily on evidence from not only his own peers but also from a series of reviews, research, and even pop culture to support his claims. The clear organization of the article also has a large impact on the effectiveness of the essay.
I believe the targeted audience for this discussion is an older generation of readers. In order to do this, he needed to direct his thoughts to an audience that would be able to relate to what he was experiencing himself.
While sharing this personal anecdote, he helps his readers to make the connection between how reading used to be and what it is like now. Young adults and children have grown up around the internet and Google, so this audience would be less likely to connect with what the author is saying.
Members of an older audience, on the other hand, would have experienced a time in their life where reading and research was done strictly from books.
Carr believes an evaluation of this comparison will further convince his readers of his opinion. Credibility is a key part to the persuasion of this article. Carr uses well-known and respected sources to validate what he is saying. This quote intrigues a reader because of the known credibility Harvard has all over the world.
Using lines from The Space Odyssey immediately makes the article relateable to many of his readers and gives them a sense of where the article is headed without him having to blatantly say it. Carr uses a strategic structure to guide the readers through this article.
He goes from personal examples to more scientific and historical examples, taking only a few paragraphs to do so. After his anecdote in the introduction, Carr goes into detail about the difficulty he has been having reading long pieces of work thoroughly.
This allows for the reader to get a hint of what the focal point of the article will be, and it also eases the reader into article.
Next, he moves on and explains conversations he has had with his peers about the same occurrence. The defined structure attempts to engage the reader so that they are hooked throughout the article rather than being deterred by scientific examples right away.
Nicholas Carr is successful in offering a thought provoking argument for readers to question if Google and the internet are making us incapable of concentration while reading a long piece if work.
He says that the result of this will be that our population will be less intelligent. He also presents credible evidence that further pushed the audience into thinking along the same lines as Carr.
This article motivates thought about Google in a different manner than most people probably have before. Carr has a strong belief in his opinion. Throughout the entire article I found myself questioning my own ability to concentrate.
Although I find his argument unique and interesting, I think he avoids one significant possibility. What if our limitless access to the internet actually makes us smarter? We can receive virtually any information on a subject with only a few clicks of a mouse. Therefore we have the ability to learn more information than anyone in the history of the world has had access to.
By adding in his opinion to this side of the argument, Carr could have made his argument even more persuasive. Works Cited Carr, Nicholas. Penguin Group USAThe Internet has become a great tool for our use in the pursuit of knowledge.
Search engines like Google, allow us to instantly find information that we are looking for and therefore gaining almost immediate knowledge on a topic. However, recently there have been some people who believe sea. Is Google Making Us Stupid???
LaGuardia College Aaron Straker 11/23/10 What the Internet is doing to Our Brains” thinks that google is even making us shallow. I am working on this essay in class, and I think this is a great piece of writing and response. It gives more insight to what the internet is actually doing to us.
In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” Nicholas Carr, a former executive editor of the Harvard Business Review and a member of the steering board for the World Economic Forum’s cloud computing project, criticizes the overall impact of the internet, as a whole, on the human process of thought, comparing his past level of conception to “a scuba diver in a sea of words” whereas.
Is Google Making Us Stupid?, by Nicholas Carr Words | 6 Pages.
The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson. The first of the many ideas conveyed in Carr’s article is that the brain is malleable like plastic.
Rhetorical Analysis of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” In this article, Nicholas Carr attempts to explain how the way information is presented on . No, Google is not making us stupid.
What Google and the Web are doing is helping us re-claim our human legacy of learning through a rapid exchange of ideas in a social setting. Google is, indeed, making us smarter as we re-discover new ways to learn.