Introduction The outcome of the election was more than a sensation. It was a political earthquake. Less than 12 weeks earlier, Winston Churchill had announced the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany.
This was published under the to Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government Delivered on: Within their critique, the CSJ set out a plan for reform for government, and today I want to look at that. But inwe inherited an economy which had entered the worst recession in living memory, with the deficit rising, costs spiralling, and GDP shrinking.
People were losing their jobs and feared for the future. Some would frame this as a rigid dichotomy: On one side, those opposing cuts, decrying all savings as an assault on the poor and vulnerable. On the other, those urging that the whip be cracked harder, clamping down on spending and making deeper cuts.
Yet the reality is rather more complex. So today, I want to show that we would have wanted to reform the welfare state, even if we had no deficit.
Welfare reform is fundamentally about opportunity and life change… … cutting the cost of social failure by transforming the life chances and outcomes of those on benefits… … restoring fiscal stability, and restoring lives at the same time.
Hidden reality 10 years ago at the CSJour aim was to gain a better understanding of why people found themselves trapped in disadvantage, and to develop solutions for helping them break free and secure their futures. In neighbourhoods blighted by worklessness… where gangs were prevalent, debt and drugs the norm… families broken down… those living there had one thing in common; they were for the most part dependent on the state for their daily needs.
For too long we let these problems be ghettoised as though they were a different country. Even now, for the most part they remain out of sight — meaning people are shocked when they are confronted with a TV programme such as Benefits Street.
Failed system The reality is that our welfare system has become distorted, no longer the safety net it was intended to be. Too often it is an entrapment — as it has been for a million people left on incapacity benefits for a decade or more, or the more than 4 million abandoned on out-of-work benefits even before the recession.
At its very worst, the present system makes criminals out of those trapped in its clutches. Faced with losing up to 94 pence of every pound they earn because of how benefits are withdrawn, too many end up in the shadow economy or working cash in hand.
Such behaviour can never be condoned, but it is a tragic state of affairs — and a mark of how far the current system has failed — that people should feel pushed into crime by having their aspirations to make a living penalised. Surely the system should deliver for people who want to work hard and play by the rules.
Positive choice Met with the problem of social breakdown, our critics would have it that a sympathetic approach is to sustain these people on slightly better incomes — [political content removed] that poverty is about money, and more state money should solve it.
Yet, too often for those locked in the benefits system, that process of making responsible and positive choices has been skewed — money paid out to pacify them regardless, with no incentive to aspire for a better life.
From dependence to independence I have long believed there is no kindness in a benefits system that traps people, leaving them in a twilight world where life is dependent on what is given to you, rather than what you are able to create.
Yet casual disapproval of those on benefits is also too easy — it does us as politicians well to remember that it was generations of politicians that created this welfare system that now traps them.Financial news and more A welfare state is not enough We need a system that involves many players health professionals.
an analysis of the state of the uk welfare will protect up to species. lasting difference to peoples lives Find out more . The United Kingdom welfare state was established in by William Beverage due to the Second World War which caused social problems to the British citizens.
The Government stepped forward as to provide for its people by introducing Welfare State as a way of controlling these problems.
Published: Wed, 10 Jan Modern welfare state development is generally considered to lead to social security or benefits payments, social housing provision, health provision, social work and educational services.
But what is the state? The Welfare State: State Intervention. However, the welfare state has always been an area of conflict. The working class has seen the welfare state as a vital safety net, which provides basic health, education and security.
In the last analysis however, if the capitalists feel threatened by the growing power of.
In government, the challenge has been to act on this ambition and make changes to restore a creaking and chaotic welfare state into one which delivers on that vision for life change. The UK.
academics seeking to an overview of meat cuts in the food service analyse welfare have developed ideo- the life and death of martin luther king jr tural feature of the UK welfare state.